tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72805078553416215.post6616788795695092134..comments2024-01-21T00:40:03.840-05:00Comments on Topps 1971: no. 189 - george mitterwaldnight owlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11673973790245316059noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72805078553416215.post-69439727041361007912013-07-08T01:47:48.661-04:002013-07-08T01:47:48.661-04:00Come on. They could have mixed it up a little bit....Come on. They could have mixed it up a little bit.night owlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11673973790245316059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72805078553416215.post-5253217588127820892013-07-04T09:17:26.769-04:002013-07-04T09:17:26.769-04:00At least he's not in the early-1960's catc...At least he's not in the early-1960's catcher's pose (looking up at a phantom pop-up).Jim from Downingtownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01537007940455183397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72805078553416215.post-76080668172147934932013-07-03T13:50:35.125-04:002013-07-03T13:50:35.125-04:00This could be a stretch but it's remotely poss...This could be a stretch but it's remotely possible he posed that way because he was a CATCHER.megbygoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09006405654274024160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72805078553416215.post-26712492559569626032013-07-02T23:10:45.995-04:002013-07-02T23:10:45.995-04:00That same pose is appropriate in his case because ...That same pose is appropriate in his case because after all, you can't spell Mitterwald without MITT, which he proudly displays.Brian Hollandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15093201252403779991noreply@blogger.com