Wednesday, March 11, 2015

no. 388 - al oliver


Who is the man: Al Oliver received an abundance of playing time in 1970 after finishing second in the NL Rookie of the Year voting in 1969. He played in 151 games for the Pirates.

Can ya dig it: Oliver is listed as a first baseman first and he basically split time between first and the outfield in 1970. His early cards show both positions until 1976 when he's listed exclusively as an outfielder all the way to 1983, when it reverts to first base again.

Right on: Oliver always looks tough on his cards. Always.

You see that cat Oliver is a bad mother: Oliver was part of five Pirates division champion teams between 1970-75. The only other players to compete on all of those teams were Willie Stargell, Manny Sanguillen, Richie Hebner and Bob Robertson.

Shut your mouth: Oliver is on record as saying that owners' collusion in the mid-1980s prevented him from reaching 3,000 hits. (Oliver retired at age 38 in 1985 with 2,743 hits). In a 1992 story in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, he recalled watching teammate Roberto Clemente reach 3,000 hits. "We were close friends and it was such a great accomplishment. But I will never forget saying to myself that some day, I would do that. I knew that barring physical injury I would reach that same point. I knew that because of the way I conditioned myself mentally and physically. I said the only thing that could stop me from playing a long time was the system. Unfortunately, it turned out I was right."

No one understands him but his woman: Oliver's first wife, Donna, was black, but because of her light skin tone, Oliver received hate mail from people who thought they had a mixed-race marriage.


(A word about the back): The first time Oliver would receive a card number ending in a "5" or a "0" would be the following year as card #575 in the 1972 Topps set. He would get a hero number for most of the rest of his career, except in 1974 and 1979.

11 comments:

  1. Al is a bit delusional that he had another 257 hits in his system. While his 83 and 84 seasons were fine (slightly above average) his 1985 season was awful. When you're 38 and hitting .250 with no power, you aren't going to get signed for your 39th year. That's reality, not collusion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are probably right, but I have another tangential point that I hope does not start a big argument. I don't see what is wrong with owner collusion. If the players can form a union, collectively bargain, go on strike, agree with each other to withdraw their services, etc. - then the owners should have the same right. If the owners are prohibited from agreeing with each other not to hire certain players, then they are being forced by law to pay higher salaries. The NFL has a salary cap that is not illegal. "Collusion" would have a similar effect.

      Delete
  2. And for the record, I like Al Oliver a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I used to love when Topps used the "hero " numbers. Do they still do it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Moose was on those teams too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oliver was one of my favorite players on the 70s Pirates. The guy could flat-out rake. I was torn when he was part of the trade that brought Blyleven to the Pittsburgh. I had coveted Bert for the Bucs for years, but to give up Al, dang! Of course, it worked out in '79 when the Pirates won the World Series, and Bert was lights-out in the post season, but it was tough to see Oliver go

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I always wished they would have brought him back like they did with Richie Hebner. It was 1985 and we didn't have anything special going on.

      Delete
    2. In 1985, the Pirates thought that 1984 was an aberration and that they could get back into contention with expensive free agents. By the time they figured out that that was a mistake, it was time to clean house and rebuild from the ground up - which they started doing seriously in August and September of that year. Oliver really didn't figure into either of those scenarios.

      Delete
  6. There's a big difference between a collective bargaining agreement, right out in the open, and a secret plan not to sign free agents.

    ReplyDelete